Author Archives: Rayhan Rashid

About Rayhan Rashid

Lawyer, academic, activist and blogger - writing from Oxford, UK. A member of International Crimes Strategy Forum (ICSF). On Twitter: http://twitter.com/rayhanrashid

Tribunal has provided reasons on the petition filed against the ICT Chairman for alleged bias

Here is the full text of the Order delivered by the Tribunal: (downloadable pdf version available here on ICSF’s E-Library)

Posted in ICT Update, Jurisprudence, Orders and Judgments, Petitions and Applications | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Tribunal to provide reasons on the petition filed against the ICT Chairman for alleged bias in a few hours

In all likelihood, it is going to be an important day for the Tribunal. In a few hours it will be 28 November 2011, the day fixed for the International Crimes Tribunal to deliver its Judgment on a petition filed … Continue reading

Posted in Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, ICT Update, Orders and Judgments, Petitions and Applications | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Position Paper on US War Crimes Ambassador Stephen Rapp’s Suggestions regarding ICT

On 15 May 2011, ICSF released its position paper on the suggestions of US War Crimes Ambassador Stephen Rapp delivered to the Government of Bangladesh regarding the ICT and its governing statute the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973. It has … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Controversy, Jurisprudence, Law, Rebuttals, Reference Material, Review | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Please Deselect International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) from the List of Honourees for 1971

According to media reports, the Government of Bangladesh, at its 40th anniversary of national independence, has taken the initiative to honour a number of individuals and organisations for their contributions during the Liberation War of 1971. While it is indeed a commendable move on the part of the government, attention of the concerned authorities also needs to be drawn urgently in respect of one particular organisation (ie, Geneva based International Commission of Jurists – ICJ) chosen for this unique honour. It is not clear what considerations prompted the government to select ICJ, but based on the review of one of ICJ’s widely quoted Report on 1971, the decision to honour ICJ appears to be an ill-advised and ill-judged one.

Briefly, ICSF’s review found the ICJ-report heavily biased and problematic on a number of aspects, such as legal, factual, strategic and diplomatic. For example, it concludes that the then leadership in 1971 were “not entitled in international law” to declare independence, effectively nullifying the legitimacy of Bangladesh’s birth. Moreover, the Report unfairly equated crimes committed by the Pakistani army and local collaborators against the people of Bangladesh with that of sufferings of the Biharis. Grossly distorting the facts, the Report categorically stated that both sides in the war committed similar “international crimes”. These are but a few of the problematic findings of this Report among many, and ICJ has never retracted its position publicly. It is our understanding that honouring ICJ would tantamount to endorsement of its findings on the part of the Government. Therefore, it is our humble request that the Government review its decision and deselect ICJ from the list of honourees. There may still be time to take rectifying measures, before the nation is left with an irrevocable bestowal of gratitude to an entity which did not deserve it in the first place… Continue reading

Posted in 1971, Analysis, Controversy, History, News, Organisational, Politics, Revisionism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Accepting “Death Penalty” under the 1973 Act

In a recently published interview, Lord Avebury seemed to have accepted death penalty as a form of punishment for the perpetrators of 1971 Liberation War, arguing that the same has popular acceptance and support in Bangladesh [..] Continue reading

Posted in Controversy, Discussion, Law, Microblogging, Policy, Translation | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Pieces of History

How would one make a choice, a correct one, without an all round appreciation of one’s own history? How can one find his own place in the handed down history and determine steps of the future without actually breathing and living it? Compilations like this, at least to an extent, are expected to facilitate that process of reckoning while the facts are still verifiable [...]
Continue reading

Posted in 1971, Analysis, Archives, Discussion, History, News, Review | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Do we really need another indemnity law for the Freedom Fighters?

Is it possible that the “legal experts” advising the government are oblivious to the obvious existence of a law that already covers this area? Or is it to create and indemnify a new class of individuals based on considerations that have very little to do with law or justice? Continue reading

Posted in 1971, Controversy, Law, Policy, Politics | Leave a comment