TwitterFacebook

5th amendment verdict paves way for justice

Published/Broadcast by :
Date : Wednesday, 25 August 2010
Author : Julfikar Ali Manik
Published at (city) :
Country concerned :
Regarding Justice process :
Keywords : , , , , , , , , ,
Language :
Entry Type : Report, Uncategorized
Source : http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=152188
Content :

Taher’s family hopes for righting a historic wrong done in secret trial 34 years back

The recent judgment of the Supreme Court cancelling the fifth amendment to the constitution has opened the door for challenging the legality of the controversial secret trial of Bir Uttam Colonel Abu Taher.

Taher’s relatives and the lawyer who moved the petition challenging the trial’s legality narrated the background of their coming forward. They said the perspective has changed after the Supreme Court’s historic verdict that declared illegal the governments and military rule and martial law regulations between the murder of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on August 15, 1975, and April 9, 1979.

Khandker Mushtaque Ahmed, Abu Sadaat Mohammad Sayem and Maj Gen Ziaur Rahman led the governments during that period.

“This changed perspective prompted us to correct the historic wrong of executing Teher in a farcical trial under a Martial Law Tribunal,” Prof Anwar Hossain, brother of Col Taher, told The Daily Star yesterday at his Dhaka University home.

Taher’s trial is controversial. His wife Lutfa Taher not only termed it illegal when she was talking to The Daily Star over the telephone, she also sees it as “the killing of Taher in the name of a secret trial”.

Lutfa wanted to seek justice for the last 34 years but she could not as she did not get even a single document of the sedition case against Taher or the proceedings of the trial in the tribunal. The tribunal had awarded Taher, former army officer and, also a sector commander during the Liberation War, death penalty and imprisoned 16 others on different terms.

“As I am sure injustice was done to Taher, I was trying to file a case against this trial but we did not even get a single document from the administration in the last 34 years…that is why I could not challenge it,” Lutfa said, adding that cancellation of the fifth amendment has created an opportunity for her to challenge the secret trial and ask for documents of the trial through the court.

Lutfa, Prof Anwar and Fatema Yusuf, wife of Taher’s bother Abu Yusuf Khan Bir Bikram who was also sentenced to life imprisonment in the hush-hush trial, are the petitioners of the case filed with the High Court Monday.

Taher was arrested on November 24, 1975 but his wife was not allowed to see him for even a moment until a few hours before his execution in the wee hours of July 21, 1976.

The tribunal took less then a month to complete the camera trial of the sedition case, filed with Mohammadpur Police Station on June 4, 1976, and delivered the verdict on July 17, 1976. Taher was executed 72 hours after the verdict delivery.

On June 14, 1976, the then president Justice Abu Sadat Mohammad Sayem constituted the Martial Law Tribunal and published a gazette notification. The trial was held inside the Dhaka Central Jail.

The chairman of the tribunal was Col Yusuf Haider from the Army and four other members were Wing Commander Mohammad Abdul Rashid from the Air Force, Acting Commander Siddique Ahmed from the Navy, Mohd Abdul Ali, first-class magistrate (Sadar South), Dhaka and Hasan Morshed, first-class magistrate (Sadar North), Dhaka, according to the gazette of 1976.

Prof Anwar was one of the 16 convicted by this tribunal and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. He said they were produced before the tribunal on June 21, 1976, a week after constitution of the tribunal.

After the first appearance before the tribunal, it adjourned proceedings for a week and resumed on June 28.

“The hearing on the case against Taher and others were completed on July 14 and the tribunal gave its verdict on July 17,” Anwar said.

Taher refused to beg mercy from the people in the administration, said Anwar.

Soon after knowing about the verdict, Lutfa through Taher’s lawyers had sent a petition to the then president and chief martial law administrator (CMLA) Sayem, army chief and deputy chief martial law administrator (later CMLA) Maj Gen Ziaur Rahman, and secretaries to home and law ministries with a prayer to reconsider the death penalty.

A day after Lutfa’s prayer on July 19, a section officer of the ministry of home affairs sent a letter to Lutfa Taher saying, “The president has not been able to accept your prayer.”

Lutfa had also written a letter to the home ministry seeking permission to see Taher as she was not aware of her husband’s whereabouts the arrest.

“But I did not get any reply from the administration,” Lutfa said.

“I got a few censored letters from Taher when he was detained and at that time I could know in which prison Taher was in. And then I rushed to that jail but heard that the authorities shifted him to another jail and they declined to tell me the name of that prison,” Said Lutfa.

She said many illegal things had been legitimised by the fifth amendment.

Leading jurist Shadeen Malik, counsel for the petitioners, told The Daily Star, “All the martial law regulations were protected by the fifth amendment to the constitution. As now the Supreme Court cancelled the legality of the Fifth Amendment, the martial law regulations are no longer protected by the constitution, which can be challenged like any other law.”

The tribunal that tried Taher and others was constituted under the Martial Law Regulation-16 of 1976.

Shahdeen said they have challenged a few provisions of the Martial law Regulation-16 which contradict with the constitution. Like having a trial in secret, getting people involved with it to take oath of secrecy and having no provision for appeal against the verdict of the tribunal.

“Any provision introduced by any martial law regulation that contradicts with the constitution can be challenged and the cancellation of the fifth amendment opened avenues for challenging all such things.” He said.

He also said the cancellation of the fifth amendment paved the way to challenge the legality of the trial of Taher. Otherwise, they had to challenge the Fifth amendmentfirst and then the secret trial.

Shahdeen said, “It would be interesting if anyone now claims compensation for their conviction and imprisonment under an unconstitutional law.”

The three petitioners, including Taher’s wife and brother, did not pray for any such compensation.

“We are not wondering about the compensation, we want justice to get ourselves free of the stigma which has been imposed on us through a farcical trial based on a false sedition charges,” Anwar said, adding, “Due to the constitutional protection of such wrong actions, the history of that period has not come into the light…now the time has come to tell the new generation the true history.”

Anwar’s 25-year-old son Sanjeeb Hossain recently completed graduation from law school where Shahdeen was his teacher.

Sanjeeb told The Daily Star, “I studied law with an aim to have justice for my uncle Col Taher who lost his life through a conspiratorial trial by a Martial law Tribunal.

LIST OF OTHER CONVICTS AND ACQUITTED PERSONS
Apart from awarding death sentence to Lt Col Abu Taher, the tribunal sentenced 16 others in different terms of imprisonment. They are: Major (retd) MA Jalil, Major Abu Yusuf Khan, Major Ziauddin Ahmad, Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal (JSD) leader ASM Abdur Rab, Prof Anwar Hossain, JSD leader and now lawmaker Hasanul Hoque Inu, JSD leader Serajul Alam Khan, CPL Altaf Hossain, CPL Shamsul Haque, Nayek subedar Md Jalaluddin, Havilder MA Barek, Rabiul Alam, Saleha Begum, Nayek Siddiqur Rahman, Havilder Abdul Hye Mazumder and CPL J Majeed.

Those acquitted: Dr Akhlaqur Rahman, Anwar Shidique, Mohiuddin, Nayek subedar Bazlur Rahman, Mahbubur Rahman Manna, Warasat Hossain Belal, Md Shahjahan, KBM Mahmood, Sharif Nurul Ambia, Havilder Sultan Ahmed, Nayek A Bari, Sgt Kazi A Kader, Kazi Rakunuddin, Nayek subedar A Latif Akhand, Nayek Shamsuddin and Sgt Syed Rafiqul Islam.


Uploaded By : abishchruto
This item has been recorded here as part of ICSF's Media Archive Project which is a crowd sourced initiative run by volunteers, a not for profit undertaking to facilitate education and research. The objective of this project is to archive media items generated by different media outlets from around the world - specifically on 1971, and the justice process at the International Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh. This archive also records items that contain information on commission, investigation and prosecution of international crimes around the world generally. Individuals or parties interested to use content recorded in this archive for purposes that may involve commercial gain or profit are strongly advised to directly contact the platform or institution where the content is originally sourced.

Facebook Comments

comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Comments

comments

Archive I: Media Archive

Archives news reports, opinions, editorials published in different media outlets from around the world on 1971, International Crimes Tribunal and the justice process.

Archive II: ICT Documentation

For the sake of ICT’s legacy this documentation project archives, and preserves proceeding-documents, e.g., judgments, orders, petitions, timelines.

Archive III: E-Library

Brings at fingertips academic materials in the areas of law, politics, and history to facilitate serious research on 1971, Bangladesh, ICT and international justice.

Archive IV: Memories

This archive records from memory the nine-month history of 1971 as experienced and perceived by individuals from all walks of life.