E-Library ‘71 – recent additions – (June 2010, week 1)
Librarians’ Note: This E-Library is maintained by the War Crimes Strategy Forum (WCSF), a strategic coalition of activists and organisations sharing the common goal of assisting the prosecution of war criminals of Bangladesh 1971. Only the members registered to E-Library site will enjoy FULL-TEXT download-access to the entries. It is advised that you open your free-account today by clicking the Registration link. To be able to download full-text of the items stored on this library, or to add new items, you will need additional user-rights which can be requested from the Library-Admin at the Feedback-Address. You are also welcome to suggest new records to the library database. We hope the resources made available on this site will facilitate serious research of high standard on issues relating to the Liberation War of Bangladesh and the prosecution of war criminals.
***********************
Abstract: The article explains the significance of the work that is being done by the ICC’s PrepComm, the body responsible for drafting the “Elements of Crime” and “Rules of Evidence and Procedure”.
Abstract: Justice Robert H Jackson regarded his service as United States Chief of Counsel at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial as “the most satisfying and gratifying experience” of his life and “infinitely more important” than his work on the Supreme Court. Many lauded Jackson’s efforts and agreed that Nuremberg represented a landmark in international law. Others denied the legitimacy of the Trial and excoriated Jackson for participating. The Trial, some argued, was a negation of principles that lie at the heart of any system of justice under law. it is odd that there is no sustained assessment of Jackson’s decision to participate in the event. Therefore, an examination of Jackson’s Nuremberg experience is of more than historical interest, since requests for judicial participation in international trials seem possible in an increasingly interdependent world.
Abstract: This book examines issues related to United State’s delayed ratification of the Genocide Convention (adopted by UN in 1948).
Abstract: This book examines issues related to United State’s delayed ratification of the Genocide Convention (adopted by UN in 1948).
Abstract: This book examines issues related to United State’s delayed ratification of the Genocide Convention (adopted by UN in 1948).
Facebook Comments